Research article    |    Open Access
International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications 2025, Vol. 16(2) 1-16

Special Education Teacher Candidates’ Metaphorical Perceptions of the Concepts of Giftedness and Special Talent

Tuğçe Merve SAĞIR, Nimet Hande TANK HONAÇ, Barış BİÇİMLİ

pp. 1 - 16

Publish Date: December 31, 2025  |   Single/Total View: 0/0   |   Single/Total Download: 0/0


Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the metaphorical perceptions of pre-service special education teachers regarding the concepts of “giftedness” and “special talent,” and to reveal their views on the impact of these concepts on professional practices. The study employed phenomenology (qualitative) design, which enables an in-depth exploration of participants’ experiences and perceptions. The research was conducted in the 2024–2025 academic year with 100 volunteer pre-service teachers enrolled in the Department of Special Education at Buca Faculty of Education. Participants were asked to produce metaphors for each concept by completing given sentences. The data were analyzed using content analysis. After the analysis, 88 valid metaphors for the concept of giftedness and 87 valid metaphors for the concept of special talent were obtained, and these metaphors were categorized under specific themes. The findings indicate that metaphors for giftedness were most frequently clustered under the categories of development (13.8%), production (12.6%), and achievement (11.5%), while metaphors for special talent were concentrated under development (34.1%), originality (20.5%), and value (20.5%). Also, 95% of the participants stated that their views on these concepts would influence their professional practices. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that pre-service teachers’ conceptual perceptions and metaphorical thinking can shape their professional attitudes and practices, and emphasizes the importance of developing pedagogical approaches in teacher education programs that take into account candidates’ mental representations rather than focusing solely on theoretical knowledge.

Keywords: Giftedness, metaphor, special talent, pre-service teachers.


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
SAGIR, T.M., HONAC, N.H.T., & BICIMLI, B. (2025). Special Education Teacher Candidates’ Metaphorical Perceptions of the Concepts of Giftedness and Special Talent. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 16(2), 1-16.

Harvard
SAGIR, T., HONAC, N. and BICIMLI, B. (2025). Special Education Teacher Candidates’ Metaphorical Perceptions of the Concepts of Giftedness and Special Talent. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 16(2), pp. 1-16.

Chicago 16th edition
SAGIR, Tugce Merve, Nimet Hande TANK HONAC and Baris BICIMLI (2025). "Special Education Teacher Candidates’ Metaphorical Perceptions of the Concepts of Giftedness and Special Talent". International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications 16 (2):1-16.

References

    Avidov Ungar, O. (2016). Understanding teachers’ attitude toward educational reforms through metaphors. International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.03.008

    Bi, T., & Olçay, Ö. (2020). Üstün zekâlı öğrencilerin zekâya ilişkin metaforik algıları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 45(203), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.20345

    Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children (Translated edition). Williams & Wilkins.

    Brevik, L. M., Gunnulfsen, A. E., & Renzulli, J. S. (2018). Student teachers’ practice and experience with differentiated instruction for students with higher learning potential. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.003

    Camcı Erdoğan, S., & Güçyeter, Ş. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının üstün zekâ ve üstün yetenek metaforları [Pre-service teachers’ metaphors about giftedness and talent]. İlköğretim Online, 18(3), 1307–1325. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.612177

    Castejón, J. L., Gilar, R., Miñano, P., & González, M. (2016). Latent class cluster analysis in exploring different profiles of gifted and talented students. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.003

    Chan, D. W. (2015). Education for the gifted and talented. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 158–164). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92137-8

    Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

    Davis, G. A.,& Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Dries, N. (2013). The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.001

    Duran, A., & Dağlıoğlu, H. E. (2017). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının üstün yetenekli çocuklara ilişkin metaforik algıları. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(3), 855-881. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.328869

    Düğmeci, E., & Kurnaz, Ö. (2024). Öğretmen adaylarının üstün zekâ ve özel yetenek kavramlarını anlamlandırma biçimleri: Metaforik bir inceleme. Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1234/uerj.2024.7.1.45

    Freeman, J. (2005). Gifted lives: What happens when gifted children grow up. Psychology Press.

    Gagné, F. (2001). Gifted and talented individuals: Developmental and educational overview. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 6176–6183). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02401-3

    Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. Macmillan.

    Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmental theory1 . High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682

    Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.

    Godor, B. P. (2019). Gifted metaphors: Exploring the metaphors of teachers in gifted education and their impact on teaching the gifted. Roeper Review, 41(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1553219

    Heller, K. A. (2001). Giftedness, psychology of. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 6222–6227). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01630-2

    Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ: Stanford-Binet highest scores. World Book Company.

    Kartal, G. (2020). Collaborative metaphor and anticipatory reflection in preservice teacher education: Is drama the answer? Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 102978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102978

    Kettler, T., Oveross, M. E., & Bishop, J. C. (2017b). Gifted education in preschool: Perceived barriers and benefits of program development. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 31(3), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2017.1319443

    Konik, A. K. (2023). “Raising gifted children” metaphor from the perspectives of Turkish gifted and talented children’s parents. International Education Studies, 16(5), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v16n5p38

    Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

    Lynch, H. L., & Fisher-Ari, T. R. (2017). Metaphor as pedagogy in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.021

    Meyers, M. C., van Woerkom, M., & Dries, N. (2013). Talent—Innate or acquired? Theoretical considerations and their implications for talent management. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.003

    Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2006). Özel eğitim hizmetleri yönetmeliği. Ankara: MEB Yayınları.

    Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2013). Özel yetenekliler rehberi. Ankara: MEB Yayınları.

    Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2013). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin eğitimine yönelik strateji ve uygulama planı. Ankara: MEB Yayınları.

    Mohamed, A., & Elhoweris, H. (2022). Perceptions of preschool teachers of the characteristics of gifted learners in Abu Dhabi: A qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1051697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051697

    OECD. (2017). The OECD handbook for innovative learning environments. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264277274-en

    Olthouse, J. (2014). How do preservice teachers conceptualize giftedness? A metaphor analysis. Roeper Review, 36(2), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2014.884200

    Oxford, R. L., Tomlinson, S., Barcelos, A., Harrington, C., Lavine, R. Z., Saleh, A., & Longhini, A. (1998). Clashing metaphors about classroom teachers: Toward a systematic typology for the language teaching field. System, 26(1), 3–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00071-7

    Özbey Gökçe, F., & Çakmakçı, Y. (2021). Öğretmen adaylarının “özel yetenekli çocuk” kavramına ilişkin metaforik algıları. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 13-35.

    Pérez-Marín, D., Hijón-Neira, R., Bacelo, A., & Pizarro, C. (2020). Can computational thinking be improved by using a methodology based on metaphors and Scratch to teach computer programming to children? Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 105849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.027

    Pfeiffer, S. I. (2012). Servicing the gifted: Evidence-based clinical and psychoeducational practice. Routledge.

    Polat, M., Sonmez, M., & Kaya, H. (2021). Öğretmenlerin özel destek gerektiren öğrencileri tanımlama biçimleri: Metaforik bir yaklaşım. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 11(4), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2021.030

    Renzulli, J. S. (1979). What makes giftedness: A reexamination of the definition. Science and Children.

    Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative (2nd ed.). Capstone Publishing.

    Saban, A. (2010). Prospective teachers' metaphorical conceptualizations of learner. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.017

    Sak, U., Ayas, M., Sezerel, B. B., Öpengin, E., Ateşgöz, N., & Demirel, Ş. (2015). Türkiye’de üstün yeteneklilerin eğitiminin eleştirel bir değerlendirmesi: Gifted and talented education in Turkey: Critics and prospects. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 5, 110–132.

    Shanshan, S., Chenhui, D., & Lijuan, L. (2022). Metaphor and board writing matter: The mediating roles of psychological distance and immersion in video lectures. Computers & Education, 191, 104630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104630

    Silva, M., & Costa, L. (2024). Brazilian teachers’ metaphors for gifted students: Exploring developmental perspectives. Gifted Education International, 40(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294231145678

    Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge University Press.

    Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The theory of successful intelligence. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 189–202.

    Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056

    Tait-McCutcheon, S., & Drake, M. (2016). If the jacket fits: A metaphor for teacher professional learning and development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.12.005

    Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford University Press.

    Tirri, K., & Laine, S. (2017). Finnish teachers’ conceptions of giftedness: A study of attitudes and practices. Gifted and Talented International, 32(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2017.1336709

    Ungar, O. A. (2016). Understanding teachers’ attitude toward educational reforms through metaphors. International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.03.008

    Ünal, D. & Gür Erdogan, D. & Demirhan, E. (2016). Bilsem’de öğrenim gören çocukların anne ve babalarının üstün yetenekli çocuk kavramına dair metaforik algıları. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5, 266-274.

    Yavuz Açıl, D., & Kanlı, Ü. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarının üstün zekâ ve özel yetenek kavramlarına ilişkin metaforik algıları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 43(193), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7192

    Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.

    Yükseköğretim Kurulu [YÖK]. (2015). Özel eğitim öğretmenliği lisans programı düzenlemeleri. Ankara: YÖK Yayınları.

    Zach, M., & Greslehner, G. P. (2023). Understanding immunity: An alternative framework beyond defense and strength. Biology & Philosophy, 38, 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-023-09893-2